This is the camouflage of the 21st century: making ourselves invisible to computer senses.
I don’t say “making ourselves invisible to the machines”, because poetic as it is, I want to be very specific that this is about hiding from the senses machines use. And not to “robot eyes”, either, because the sensors machines have aren’t necessarily sight or hearing. Indeed, computer vision is partly a function of optics, but it’s also a function of mathematics, of all manner of prediction, often of things like neural networks that are working out where things might be in a sequence of images. Most data-analysis and prediction doesn’t even rely on a thing we’d recognise as a “sense”, and yet it’s how your activities are identified in your bank account compared to those of a stranger who’s stolen your debit card. Isn’t that a sense?
The camouflage of the 21st century is to resist interpretation, to fail to make mechanical sense: through strange and complex plays and tactics, or clothes and makeup, or a particularly ugly t-shirt. And, as new forms of prediction – human, digital, and (most-likely) human-digital hybrids – emerge, we’ll no doubt continue to invent new forms of disguise.
Unrelated to those thoughts, but about them:
This isn’t necessarily a bad thing, but it’s an unnerving one: this thing of dwelling in half-formed thoughts, loose ideas-of-ideas, and then finding that friends and colleagues have already found the words for them. Not that they’ve found them first, because first doesn’t matter, but they’ve found better, more succinct, more precise words than I’d find in any event.
These are important ideas that Tom is articulating here. They have roots from ideas from many of our friends, and they will blossom into other ideas for other people still.
Infovore » 21st-century camouflage
(via slavin)
(via notevensurewhy)
Source: infovore.org
38 Notes/ Hide
-
geoffnorthcott likes this
-
showingpeoplethings likes this
-
michelangelo-mcescher likes this
-
worsethandetroit reblogged this from notational
-
worsethandetroit likes this
-
saidtotheuniverse likes this
-
cloois likes this
-
ekstasis likes this
-
erickd likes this
-
dariuscaine likes this
-
latenighttaskforce likes this
-
bryc3 likes this
-
meklarian likes this
-
clawx likes this
-
roomthily likes this
-
disoriental likes this
-
somegirlsblog reblogged this from notational
-
prestia likes this
-
notational reblogged this from dpstyles
-
msg likes this
-
dpstyles reblogged this from slavin
-
michaelk42 reblogged this from mnemovore
-
michaelk42 likes this
-
cannibalfetus likes this
-
160b likes this
-
iskandr reblogged this from slavin
-
mnemovore reblogged this from notevensurewhy
-
mnemovore likes this
-
idfdz said:
I like what Tom wrote a lot, but I think there’s some other similar fallacies in Gadney’s original post. I wrote a bit here: urbanhonking.com/ideasfo…
-
antistigma reblogged this from notevensurewhy
-
naranzarian likes this
-
notevensurewhy reblogged this from slavin
-
whoisbma likes this
-
lloyd2nd reblogged this from slavin
-
hello likes this
-
slavin posted this
